BACKGROUND: To assess the efficacy of emergency extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (eSWL) as first-line treatment in patients with acute colic due to obstructive ureteral stone. METHODS: 74 patients were randomized to emergency SWL within 12 hours (eSWL group) and deferred SWL later than 3 days (dSWL group). Follow-up included ultrasound, KUB (Kidney-Ureter-Bladder) radiography and CT (computed tomography) scan at 24 hours, 7 days, 1 and 3 months from the treatment. When necessary, repeated SWL (re-SWL) or ureteroscopy (auxiliary-URS) was performed. Preoperative and postoperative data were compared and stone free rates (SFR) and efficiency quotients (EQ) were evaluated. Analyses were performed using SAS software. RESULTS: Complete data of 70 patients were collected. 36 underwent eSWL and 34 dSWL. The mean patient age was 48.7. Mean stone size was 9.8 mm (CI 95%, 8.9-10.8). 25 (35.7%) were proximal and 45 (64.3%) distal. Mean SWL energy was 19.2 kV (CI 95%, 18.5-19.9) and mean number of shocks was 2657 (CI 95%, 2513-2802). eSWL patients needs less auxiliary-URS than dSWL patients (13.9% vs 44.1%, p=0.039) and less re-SWL sessions (8.3% vs 32.4%, p=0.093). SFR at 24 hours was 52.8% and 11.8% (p<0.001) and the EQ at 3 months was 79.1% and 57.5% in the eSWL and dSWL group respectively. Patients from the dSWL group spent more time in the hospital (2.21 vs 1.36 days, p=0.046) and complication rates between the two groups were similar. CONCLUSIONS: eSWL is a safe procedure and delivers high SFR even within 24 hours especially for <10mm stones. It is able to reduce the number of auxiliary procedures and hospitalization.

Emergency extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (eSWL) as opposed to delayed SWL (dSWL) for the treatment of acute renal colic due to obstructive ureteral stone: a prospective randomized trial

Bucci, Stefano;Umari, Paolo
;
Rizzo, Michele;Pavan, Nicola;Liguori, Giovanni;Barbone, Fabio;Trombetta, Carlo
2018-01-01

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To assess the efficacy of emergency extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (eSWL) as first-line treatment in patients with acute colic due to obstructive ureteral stone. METHODS: 74 patients were randomized to emergency SWL within 12 hours (eSWL group) and deferred SWL later than 3 days (dSWL group). Follow-up included ultrasound, KUB (Kidney-Ureter-Bladder) radiography and CT (computed tomography) scan at 24 hours, 7 days, 1 and 3 months from the treatment. When necessary, repeated SWL (re-SWL) or ureteroscopy (auxiliary-URS) was performed. Preoperative and postoperative data were compared and stone free rates (SFR) and efficiency quotients (EQ) were evaluated. Analyses were performed using SAS software. RESULTS: Complete data of 70 patients were collected. 36 underwent eSWL and 34 dSWL. The mean patient age was 48.7. Mean stone size was 9.8 mm (CI 95%, 8.9-10.8). 25 (35.7%) were proximal and 45 (64.3%) distal. Mean SWL energy was 19.2 kV (CI 95%, 18.5-19.9) and mean number of shocks was 2657 (CI 95%, 2513-2802). eSWL patients needs less auxiliary-URS than dSWL patients (13.9% vs 44.1%, p=0.039) and less re-SWL sessions (8.3% vs 32.4%, p=0.093). SFR at 24 hours was 52.8% and 11.8% (p<0.001) and the EQ at 3 months was 79.1% and 57.5% in the eSWL and dSWL group respectively. Patients from the dSWL group spent more time in the hospital (2.21 vs 1.36 days, p=0.046) and complication rates between the two groups were similar. CONCLUSIONS: eSWL is a safe procedure and delivers high SFR even within 24 hours especially for <10mm stones. It is able to reduce the number of auxiliary procedures and hospitalization.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2146959-2-9.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Copyright Editore
Dimensione 3.92 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.92 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
11368_2925883_print.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Post Print VQR3
Tipologia: Bozza finale post-referaggio (post-print)
Licenza: Digital Rights Management non definito
Dimensione 4.51 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.51 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11368/2925883
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 10
  • Scopus 26
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 26
social impact