We introduce an approach to sensitivity analysis of quantitative risk models, for the purpose of identifying the most influential inputs. The proposed approach relies on a change of measure derived by minimising the χ2-divergence, subject to a constraint (‘stress’) on the expectation of a chosen random variable. We obtain an explicit solution of this optimisation problem in a finite space, consistent with the use of simulation models in risk management. Subsequently, we introduce metrics that allow for a coherent assessment of reverse (i.e. stressing the output and monitoring inputs) and forward (i.e. stressing the inputs and monitoring the output) sensitivities. The proposed approach is easily applicable in practice, as it only requires a single set of simulated input/output scenarios. This is demonstrated by application on a simple insurance portfolio. Furthermore, via a simulation study, we compare the sampling performance of sensitivity metrics based on the χ2- and the Kullback-Leibler divergence, indicating that the former can be evaluated with lower sampling error.

Sensitivity analysis with χ2-divergences

Millossovich P.;
2021-01-01

Abstract

We introduce an approach to sensitivity analysis of quantitative risk models, for the purpose of identifying the most influential inputs. The proposed approach relies on a change of measure derived by minimising the χ2-divergence, subject to a constraint (‘stress’) on the expectation of a chosen random variable. We obtain an explicit solution of this optimisation problem in a finite space, consistent with the use of simulation models in risk management. Subsequently, we introduce metrics that allow for a coherent assessment of reverse (i.e. stressing the output and monitoring inputs) and forward (i.e. stressing the inputs and monitoring the output) sensitivities. The proposed approach is easily applicable in practice, as it only requires a single set of simulated input/output scenarios. This is demonstrated by application on a simple insurance portfolio. Furthermore, via a simulation study, we compare the sampling performance of sensitivity metrics based on the χ2- and the Kullback-Leibler divergence, indicating that the former can be evaluated with lower sampling error.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
SA_using_Chi_squared_divergences_WP_Jan_2021.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print
Licenza: Digital Rights Management non definito
Dimensione 4.69 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.69 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Millossovich Sensitivity analysis.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Descrizione: articolo
Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Copyright Editore
Dimensione 668.93 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
668.93 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
3000527_Millossovich Sensitivity analysis-Post_print.pdf

Open Access dal 03/12/2022

Tipologia: Bozza finale post-referaggio (post-print)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.12 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.12 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11368/3000527
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact